‘Symbolic Power’ in the Official Covid-19 Field and Language

Authors

  • Costas S. Constantinou University of Nicosia Medical School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevhuman.v11.3080

Keywords:

Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, Symbolic power, Bourdieu, Discourse, Pandemics

Abstract

The covid-19 pandemic caused countries around the globe to take measures, and to construct a specific set of language to talk about the virus. The present discussion paper aims to unpack this language based on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of ‘symbolic power’, and social observations. The analysis indicates that the covid-19 field was formulated where an official language was produced, including scientific, war, enforcement and censorship linguistic practices. The paper discusses why there is not one covid-19 field and linguistic practice, causing a diversity of understanding the pandemic. The paper opens new directions in studies of language on public health threats.

References

Bian, Y., Miao, X., Lu, X., Ma, X., & Guo, X. (2020). The Emergence of a COVID-19 Related Social Capital: the Case of China. International Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 419-433.

Bird, S.E. (2003). The Audience in Everyday Life. Routledge.

Blume, C. (2020). German Teachers’ Digital Habitus and Their Pandemic Pedagogy. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 879-905.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Polity.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Polity.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Making the Economic Habitus: Algerian Workers Revisited. Ethnography 1(1), 17–41.

Bowling, A. (2014). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. McGraw-hill education.

Buchholz, L. (2016). What Is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-state. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 31-60.

Constantinou, C. S. (2021). Responses to Covid-19 as a form of ‘biopower’. International Review of Sociology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.2000069

Constantinou, C.S. (2020). “People Have to Comply with the Measures”: Covid-19 in “Risk Society." Journal of Applied Social Science, 15(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724420980374

Davis, L. (2021). In the Time of Pandemic, the Deep Structure of Biopower Is Laid Bare. Critical Inquiry, 47(S2), S138-S142.

Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Gerard, F. M. (2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558-572.

Giritli Nygren, K., & Olofsson, A. (2020). Managing the Covid-19 Pandemic Through Individual Responsibility: the Consequences of a World Risk Society and Enhanced Ethnopolitics. Journal of Risk Research, 22, 1-5.

Graham, H. (2020). Hysteresis and the Sociological Perspective in a Time of Crisis. Acta Sociológica, 63(4), 450-452.

Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative Methods for Health Research. SAGE.

Heffernan, C., Misturelli, F., & Thomson, K. (2011). The Representation of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in the Chinese Media. Health, Risk & Society, 13(7-8), 603-620.

Kothari, A. (2016). Signifying AIDS: How Media Use Metaphors to Define a Disease. African Journalism Studies, 37(2), 19-39.

Lahire, B. (2003) From the Habitus to an Individual Heritage of Dispositions. Towards a Sociology at the Level of the Individual. Poetics, 31(5-6), 329-355.

Lean, M.L. (2007). AIDS and its Associates: a Discourse Representation of the Disease. Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines, 1(1), 19-35.

Lo, MC., & Hsieh, HY. (2020). The “Societalization” of Pandemic Unpreparedness: Lessons from Taiwan’s COVID Response. American journal of cultural sociology, 8(3), 384-404.

Luders, C. (2004). Field observation and ethnography. In U. Filck, E. Von Kardoff, & Steinke, I. (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 222-230). Sage Publications.

Mabhala, M.A., Yohannes, A., Massey, A. & Reid, J.A. (2020). Mind your Language: Discursive Practices Produce Unequal Power and Control over Infectious Disease: A Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 11, 37.

Matthewman, S., & Huppatz, K. (2020) A sociology of Covid-19. Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 675-683.

Moodley, P., & Lesage, S. S. (2020). A discourse analysis of Ebola in South African newspapers (2014–2015). South African Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 158-169.

Munhall, P. (2012). Nursing Research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Pazzanese, C. (May 8, 2020). Battling the ‘Pandemic of Misinformation’. The Harvard Gazzete, Health and Medicine. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/05/social-media-used-to-spread-create-covid-19-falsehoods/

Petrikas M. (2019). Bourdieusian Concepts and the Field of Theatre Criticism. Nordic Theatre Studies, 31(1), 38-57.

Rocamora, A. (2002). Fields of fashion: Critical insights into Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. Journal of Consumer Culture, 2(3), 341-362.

Um-Lo, N. (2020). Biopower, Mediascapes, and the Politics of Fear in the Age of COVID‐19. City & Society, 32(2).

Wallis, P., & Nerlich, B. (2005). Disease Metaphors in New Epidemics: the UK Media Framing of the 2003 SARS Epidemic. Social science & medicine, 60(11), 2629-2639.

Wu, C. (2020). Social Capital and COVID-19: a Multidimensional and Multilevel Approach. Chinese Sociological Review, 30, 1-28.

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

S. Constantinou, C. (2022). ‘Symbolic Power’ in the Official Covid-19 Field and Language. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevhuman.v11.3080